Another ‘Time Traveller’ Caught in Museum Photo?

It’s the short description for the photograph shown at the virtual Bralorne Pioneer Museum, from British Columbia, Canada.

“Reopening of the South Fork Bridge after flood in Nov. 1940. 1941 (?)”

The man with what appears to be very modern sunglasses seems to be wearing a stamped T-shirt with a nice sweater, all the while holding a portable compact camera!

Sunglasses: A better view of the sunglasses

Internet people reached to the obvious conclusion: it’s a time travellercaught on camera on 1940! Finally, we have proof!

If the story seems straight out of a movie and the photo is in itself a great funny find, the most amusing thing i came up with while looking into this – as an Internet person, on the Internet – was the reply for a skeptical, or perhaps somewhat cynical comment on how spurious it would seem the idea that a time traveler would want to visit the reopening of a bridge in some small town in Canada.

Read this on Doc Brown’s voice: “Of course, because we know nothing happened there right? But if we are considering time travel, how can we know if in some other timeline something historical happened right there?”

Indeed! Once you consider time travel, everything changes. But before writing Hollywood scripts, let’s get back to reality and ask again: is the photo evidence of a time traveller?

The source

As noted, the image is indeed available through the official website for Canada’s museums. It was part of the exhibit “Their Past Lives Here” from Bralorne-Pioneer, available to the public since 2004. It was put online since February this year, perhaps before that. And the peculiar “time traveller” image was only noted as such in the end of March.

Given the source, we would assume the photo is authentic, and correctly dated to c.1940. Indeed, an Error Level Analysis suggests the image was not digitally tampered with, or at least that if it was, the author was smart enough to normalize the error across the whole thing.

So, how do we explain the man out of time?

Not quite out of time

Read the comments: Not quite out of time on: forgetomori

Once again, it must be clear that even if this photograph is authentic, even if it depicts a real scene from 1940, it would not be the proof of time travel.

It remains a mystery, if anyone knows more about this picture, person or event, please let us know.

Source: forgetomor

2 responses to “Another ‘Time Traveller’ Caught in Museum Photo?

  1. It’s not a MODERN sunglasses.
    It was any OLD sunglasses of 1940 th. It was so-called blinker sunglasses.

    For example:
    A men of 1940th with the same sunglasses.
    A girl with the same glasses, July 1940


  2. seems like that bitch wants his dick.. she isnt looking at his “camera” and if it is a “camera” the guy in the front has the same exact “camera