Disk Shaped UFO over Melbourne Australia – Nov 8, 2011

Witness: There appears to be a dark bottom, dark top with a light band in the middle.

I don’t think it’s a bird, it takes up one third of the camera frame.

Recorded November 9 2011 about 4am – Melbourne Australia.

Source and author:  (youtube)

16 responses to “Disk Shaped UFO over Melbourne Australia – Nov 8, 2011

  1. A lot of activity on the 8th.

    Like

  2. bubbleburster

    There is an issue w/ this vid. As the object passes out of frame to the left is passes BEHIND a star. Not sure what that would indicate. A bug or bird would pass in front of and block the view of the star. If it’s behind the star it would either have to be a doctored video, poorly done, or something RIDICULOUSLY humongous passing through space at a very far distance. Since the size scale of the object is beyond belief if it were far enough away to be behind a star then I vote for fake video.

    Like

    • Cool Vid! bubbleburster makes a good observation regarding the star…would not be to quick however to jump to conclusions based on beliefs of how 3-space should work. Consider this…may or may not be an “object” as such at all…the appearance is of a space/time distortion likely gravitational if an object is involved…possibably harmonic in nature with no object required…in either case I would guess its relative speed to be around 3xC (3x speed of light)…if harmonic in nature the space distorted could well be any size…as large as the “area of a galaxy”…if gravitational, the question of passing infront of the star becomes irrelevant as well. The light the observer recorded (the star) left the source thousands if not millions of years ago…an object passing between the source and observer would not block the visable star unless it were a. optically solid… b. moving at a reletive speed a fraction of “C”… and c. very close to the observer. If this second scenario were to be tested, one would only need to continue to observe the star to see if it blinks out for an instant at some point in the future. If for example one year from now it “blinked”, you would possibly have evidence an object passed between it and the observer one year ago…assuming relitive light speed…
      …I vote the video not fake…

      Like

  3. Asteroid YU55🙂

    Like

  4. i agree its a fake as the object travels behind the star at the left of the frame which is beyond any belief that such an object could be captured if further than that star!

    Like

    • …beyond the star…beyond beliefe…
      Q: is “reality” in fact limited by your “beliefe”…or is it possible that only your perception of reality is limited by your beliefs?

      Like

    • passing behind the star could be an illusion of the cloaking kind, replicating the images behind you to hide whats in front of your face. More of our secret tech in my opinion.

      Luke

      Like

      • …good point…could be our own… if its not, it would be silly to think any advanced civilization didn’t possess at least this level of tech…

        Like

  5. looks like one of those “tube” ufos, supposed ufo or creatures that undulate through the air. there is, however, no frontal light reflected off of it, so it’s hard to tell, but in slow-mo it appears to have a wavy affect to it. could be wrong. as to it going behind the star…….i …….don’t……..know. cloaking device? interesting thought, but not very effective. He did catch it on video. Seems like such an advanced civilization could do a bit better. They can fool NORAD, but not a hand held video. Should we let them know we’ve got them figured out, or just keep it between ourselves?

    Like

  6. It looks more like an atmospheric biological creature worming it’s way through the atmosphere. Somewhat amoebic, it would be mostly transparent (did not go behind a star). Notice how it acts like a worm of sorts, contracting and expanding its way through each frame when viewed in slow motion. It’s a living, transparent entitiy, normally invisible to the naked eye, but captured on video. Maybe, you should call Ghost Busters.

    Like

    • I am guessing you refer to “rods”, terrestrial yet not normally visible due to their high rate of vibration…would be interesting to know what camera was used at what speed…

      Like

  7. Bejesus! Again, really?! For starters the object is not behind the “star” and it is impossible to be between the “star” and the observer without obscuring the “star” regardless of how much flawed math you throw at it. As vision is reflected light gathered in the retina (camera in this case), and as C is constant in a vacuum, means the light reflected from the object (allowing us to see it) is travelling at exactly the same speed as the light from the star toward our eye / camera, so when the light from both objects hits our eyes we see it as it actually happened, ie. it was never between the “star” and the camera or it would’ve looked that way. Either we are seeing a galaxy sized light emitting object that passed behind a “star” a squillion years ago etc. or as I suspect, looks like a camera fault, kind of a dead pixel thing going on. Its shape and hue is different from the other stars.
    This in no way is meant to deride the filmed object itself, if I had to guess, I’d say it was a bird close up.

    Like

  8. Last night 11/10/11 at about 3am to 4am or so. I saw the underbelly of a craft that flew over my building very low. I heard it coming then looked out my window which faces the pacific in malibu. I saw the underbelly that had two big round red disks/possibly lights? It was unusually large as it went towards and over ocean. Way bigger than a plane. Anyone see it?

    Like

  9. After looking closely at the “star” mentioned, it looks more like a burnt pixel on the camera, I think if you look closely at it, it doesn’t resemble the same hues, glows, as the other stars do, it is also more of a rectangular shape and quite sharp edged.

    Like

  10. Definitely this is a pixel error in the camera. Everybody working with Digicams should be used to that. It has a completly different texture than all the other stars. So there does nothing fly behind any star! And there is no hint for a hoax neither imho. But it could be a bird under special circumstances….

    Like