400 Million Year Old Machine Found in Russia

400 Million Year Old Machine Found in Russia
RUSSIA. In the remote Kamchatka peninsula (map below), 200 km from Tigil, University of St. Petersburg archaeologists discovered a strange fossil. The authenticity of the find has been certified. According archaeologist Yuri Golubev, occurs that, in this case the discovery surprised scientists by its nature, at least – unusual, able to change history (or pre-history).
russia

It is not the first time that is an artifact, an ancient object, something like this is found in that region. But, surprisingly conserved, this specific artifact is – at first glance, inlaid in rock (which is understandable since the peninsula is home to numerous volcanoes). Subjected to analysis, the conjunct showed to be made of metal parts that seem to form a mechanism, a gear which may be of a type of watch or computer. The astonishing is that all the pieces were dated in 400 million! of anos.Yury Gobulev commented:

We got a call from the prefec of Tigil. He told us that hikers that were walking in place, found these remains in rock. We went to the place indicated, and initially we not understand what we saw. There were – hundreds of toothed cylinders which appeared to be parts of a machine.

They were in perfect state of conservation, as if they were frozen in a short period of time. It was necessary control the area, because soon the curious began to appear in large numbers. Other scientists, americans geologists, defined the piece as an amazing and mysterious artifact.

Nobody could believe that 400 million years ago could have existed on Earth even a man (even more a machine). At that time, the forms of vida were very simple, but the finding, (simply) – clearly suggests the existence of intelligent beings capable of such technology. Certainly, such beings would had come from other planets. It is possible that a spaceship can had was damaged (or there was an accident) and it was abandoned in place.

russia

It was found also that the parts have reached to the fossilization state in a period of time historicaly and geologically short. Possibly, the “machine” fell into a swamp. Despite the findings, cautious, scientists prefer to consider that the evidences are not definitive – yet. And Gobulev ponders: Refuse the existence of technology [even in past as indented] is a serious mistake because evolution is not linear.

Report originally
Misterioso Fossile in Russia: Astronave Antica
ZaZoom/IItaly, published in 03 /06/2012

Source: brazilweirdnews russia

UPDATE: March 10, 2012

Special thanks to our regular reader Kurt

400 Million Year Old Machine Found in Russia HOAX

Image of apparent fossil found in Kamchatka peninsula and analyzed by Yuri Golubev appears to be a HOAX as no professor by the name of Yuri Golubev is listed on the St-Petersburg university website. The image appears to be that of Laudonomphalus regularis from the Crinoids species that are marine animals that make up the class Crinoidea of the echinoderms. In fact the same non cropped image can be found on Wikipedia, a sample that was found in France, not Russia.

Wikipedia: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:FossileLaudonomphalus_regularis.jpg

and here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crinoid

 

 

 

40 responses to “400 Million Year Old Machine Found in Russia

  1. At first glance, I thought that they could be crinoid (sea lilies) fossils but they do have unnatural appearance to them.

    Like

  2. OK now lets see how the powers to be spin their BS as to what it may be but how old it actually is. Will be interesting to hear them lie to us again.

    Like

  3. I am a little bit doubtful about this as the story originated in the weekly world news and we all know what that publishes

    Like

  4. Everyone insist thinking about ET when found those things. Why not try to understand some biblical perspective about those issues?

    When read in Genesis 1:2 “2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.”….
    The word “was” is wrong. The original hebrew is “became”. So the Earth became without form, and void. There was an eden earth before the planet we know now and it was inhabited by angels, as a lot of other planets because those beings were far more intelligente than us, but some of them (onde third) became agaist their Creator and Lucifer (Helel Ben Shakar) fall and only the rest of universe became a big collection of ruins.
    Now they want to come back as they did in Genesis 6 at Mount Hermon and have sexual intercourse with women. Now they do the same thing thru the name of abduction and trying to make we “swallow” them as if they are aliens from another worlds. Yes, they are ETs, but not from another world, they’re from another dimension and they will “arraive” just when Yahweh wants to fullfill the Prophecy.
    Jesus bless you all. Accept him while we still have time.

    Like

  5. As much as i would love to believe that this is a 400 million year old machine…it really looks like fossilized plant stems…check out
    http://www.safossils.com/crinoids.html and make your own conclusions.
    Cheers.

    Like

  6. Sure looks like common crinoid segments to me!!

    Like

  7. Baloney!

    Like

  8. I want More from this article.
    I want metallurgy done. Internal carbon dating, not surface.
    I want scans showing the pieces that we cannot see on the surface.
    I want the surrounding rocks in the area to be sampled tested.
    I want Psychics to handle it.
    And More,… Much more.
    I have No problem with the notion of ancient machine parts being found frozen in rock or coral. But I want metal types and proper dates to be ascertained by by several “separate” indipendant sources.
    ~VARAKIENEN.

    Like

  9. NO , there was no Angels living with humans in the EDEN , the Bible do not support this wrong theory , man made like almost believes , people want to believe what they want to believe , YES the bible are a very important ancient history source ( excluding the religious believe ) and by the chronology events inside the bible you can go back to 6.000 years back , so , if this find are not ancient marine vegetation that looks very like , but like Vara said … till the valid accurate test so see if this find are metal and accurate time on the ” artifacts itself ” still a mystery … and really go back million”s” years , just proves what the arqueology already found sites “cities and monuments over 20.000 years old that obliterate the modern science and bible that intelligent humans are walking on earth to around just 6.000 years . About the find in this article still 50/50 till they prove this are made by metal and a accurate time , till there …. hummm , I hope see more updates on this one🙂

    Like

    • sONIC.
      Are we really going to have a discussion of Biblical time keeping?
      Its one of the reasons I broke away from Catholicism at 16.
      I was always fascinated how bible thumpers explained dinosaur fossils.
      And how they couldnt accept the notion that the bible has been cropped, edited, re-written and propagandized so many times, that it can hardly count as an accurate source of historical reference.
      Its a fun comedy of errors now.

      Like

    • Okay, YOU have to study much more Bible than you think. What I wrote here came from Michael Heiser, PhD and a lot of other serious researches. Search for him in the net and you will start to think that there is a lot of very studied people behind this. First of all: b’nei elohim is a God’s direct creature and b’nei adami are descendents from Adam. Of course you don’t know it, if so, you will never write this.
      I spended 15 years of my life researching theories like that you reply me. Belive me it was a BIG lost of time walking thru this new age stuff. But, if you want to understand me, go for really serius research about the Bible, not what the church say to you.
      And, show me at least 6 months of any graduation or course did by Zecharia Sitchin about ancient languages. Mike Heiser waits for these for so long.

      Like

  10. Rocky Mcgilicutty

    Looks like mushrooms to me or some type of fungi

    Like

  11. vARA , and here you come again going against someone conment cause dont match your point of view or personal believes , you like or not the bible ARE one historical reference we have , and YES was write by mans like ALL literature in this PLANET .. the chronology about the kingdoms from Egypt to Rome , the kings name and important s events match with anothers reference on each country etc etc , I don’t wanna go this discussion cause have no end , and my reference on the bible are not religious but as a ancient book . And have you never research about the Altered History , you don’t believe in the Bible as reference , so you believe in whit one ? … cause all write by man and altered the same way , so … we can not believe anything cause everything was and ARE. write and copy and re-edit by mans , no monkeys .. who you expect ? use this claime to invalidate the bible goes to all literature in this world . About the faith and interpretation from the Bible , I agree , are corrupted and block people mind and deviate from search the truth beyond the borders , I believe in phisical beings from another planets ( aliens ) UFO .. I saw by my self around 5 times here in Japan , but I keep the balance , cause I believe the truth can not be find in one single place , are a jigsaw … the pieces are everywhere ” include the bible ” Egypt , Mayans … etc etc , block the bible because you religious complex , you gonna be loosing pieces of the puzze , open your mind vARA , and stop to try be the Smarter one who have the only true , respect another people opinion , you don’t have all pieces , nobody have ” maybe the top elite ILUMINATI but for sure not 100%. or they quit . your way to thinking and impose your own thinking are the only true , just looks similar the ones you are against , wake up vara , come Dow … and if your pride ‘ very clear in your basic conment’s ‘. it’s fine for me … I can stop to conment here , I have nothing to loose . grow up v !

    Like

  12. sonic, though your english is a little broken, you’ve done quite well making your point. and vara, youre so full of crap your eyes are brown. Really, please show me how the bible is “a fun comedy of errors”. And really, what part of it has been proven historically incorrect? Did you have a problem with a priest? You dumped your religion because you can’t reconcile biblical chronology? Wow, must have been a deep level of faith. And sonic is right, your arrogance is becoming disgusting. I used to feel a bit of empathy for you. Who knows what happened to you as a kid. Maybe deep down you’re a good guy. But i’m struggling to hold to that level. When you don’t like a response, or, God forbid, the bible is mentioned, you go into hyperoverdrive. You’re like a dog spraying a tree, or a peacock preening and trying to attract a mate, ie. your true colors show. I get so sick of religion bashers. It’s not that they want to bash something, it’s that when they do it they act like it proves that they are not as “close-minded” as those “bible thumpers” when all the while their self-indulgent arrogance reeks of self-importance. And by the way, vara, the bible does NOT say the earth is only 6000 years old. And the bible has more than one description of creatures that could only be dinosaurs. Ha! What do you mean, chuck, are you saying that men walked with dinosaurs? No vara, I’m saying that the Illuminati is working with lizard alien people to dominate the world by killing us off but don’t worry the good aliens will come down and save us, and “love is all you need(love is all you need), love is all you need”. The underwater lizard bases recently destroyed by the Nibiru planet has temporarily shut down the time portal stargate that the Andromeda Galactic Stargate Council had opened orginally to allow the egyptians to build the pyramids with anti-gravity energy beams. Please stop taking yourself(ves) so seriously. Do you really think that you are clever because you believe in stuff that can’t be scrutinized or tested scientifically. You mock religious people because they believe what they see experientially (design), while you feign superiority because no one seems to be able to refute the fairy tales you believe in. Again, vara, my smart ass friend, give me one, I’m only asking for one, instance in which the Bible has been proven inaccurate historically, and instance for which no person or bible scholar has been able to refute with fact. I intend to ride you on this until you shut up or put up. Learn to be quiet or learn to defend your position with something more than mockery or arrogance. You like to pretend you are some sort of objective moderator. You are no such thing. You are as biased and close-minded as those you put down, with a huge dose of arrogance thrown in. How about we moderate you and hold you accountable, and ask that you offer something other than belittling and mockery. I intend to. No, i am not trying to scare or intimidate you. You, by your own words, are above such things, though occassionally you “fall down to our level”. Nope, i’m simply letting you know that you won’t get away with it anymore. You either apologize, back off, and actually let people post their opinions, or I will be a tick on your ass. If you’re not going to like it, then learn, or find someway to block me from this site. I look forward to, if you’ve got the guts, and can come down to “my” level, debating you on the issues. One last suggestion….try reading the bible before mocking it. And again, put up or shut up. Nothing but love

    Like

  13. hey. Just stating My own personal Opinion here.
    We are allowed to Do that right? But if others dont subscribe to it we get attacked? Geeze, Thats new. lolol.
    Wow, you guys are such Hypocrites.
    But Ok, Ill play the game, cuz I love the game.
    Chuck you believe in Bible math and time keeping?
    Lets see you Prove that the world is only 6000 yrs old.
    Or tell ya what, lets see you prove that man him self is Only 6000 years old.
    Lets see you Prove that a man named Adam existed as the first man created.
    Tell me chuck, was Eve the first woman? or was there another?
    God, the bible has been so edited, re-translated, doctored, and changed that it simply cannot be considered a accurate reliable source of history.
    And I stand by that statement firmly and unshakably.

    Now, do we even Have fossils of fungus any where? Im pretty knowledgeable about fossils, and Im not sure I recall any being fossilized.
    Plants and fibrous organics yes, but not actually fungus.
    Same problem exists with Jellies, dispite the fact that we know they are the Most primative of life forms. Literally colonies of single cell organisms that make up a unified cooporative whole. The first complex life forms above single cell. But still, no fossil records. So, How do we KNOW they are the first? How can we Prove it?

    Im very fascinated with the notion that this may be some form of machine encased in ancient stone.
    We already Know the Antikythera Mechanism shouldnt exist from the time and place it comes from, but it does.
    Time travel evidence? remnants of alien technology left behind? genius far and away before its time? sure, why not.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antikythera_mechanism
    How about the giant foot print in stone?

    And there are SO many potential, (but not proven beyond a shadow of a doubt because frankly there’s no such thing as Proof. Proof is subjective and what qualifies as proof to one, is refutable as proof to another.) other artifacts, ruins, hieroglyphs, petroglyphs, and more that are evidence to the notion that history as We have been taught, is Not accurate. And these are just the evidenses that have managed to slip through the screening process or Net that the shadow powers have in place. So many other artifacts have been confiscated, and witness’s/scientists, gone missing who wanted to blow the whistle.
    The subject fascinates me to no end, When we can avoid the distractions of morons intent on keeping us from thinking for our selves, keep us from asking questions, comparing notes, or exploring past the boundaries of what is previously written or taught in schools.
    Its time to wake up, and ask questions.

    Next?
    ~ VARAKIENEN

    Like

  14. Im not one for bible bashing but i do see alot of inconsistencies in its pages, and since I have always questioned my existence i never really liked to follow any religion even through a catholic schooling. I was always too fascinated by the unknown to have the message thrust at me that we are not supposed to question our very being, and although many say this isn’t the way the bible teaches, its very first metaphor is the forbidden fruit. Adam and Eve are told, do not eat from the tree of knowledge, why? because, at some point in the dark ages when the bible was rewritten by Rome for the 2nd or 3rd time, there was the power play of making sure that the peasants didn’t know enough to become smarter than their masters and kings, and so it has always been through the dark ages right up until the mid 1940’s when people began to publicly question Christianity. This clouding of knowledge metaphor was used by the top boys to stop us questioning the heavens and the earth and how we came to be, instead making us place our faith in the fact that THEY held the knowledge. Now over the past 70years we have seen a drastic fall in numbers of Christians across the globe in par with us questioning our existence. Now I know that it is the few spoiled apples that ruin the basket in terms of over the top believers, but when you have delt with enough spoiled apples you tend to not even sift through the rest of the basket searching for the odd ones out. As i say, im not a bible basher, but i have and always will question the universe and an altered book that tells me that is wrong doesn’t have a place in my life.

    As to Chuck; yes the bible has several sections mentioning events that are present throughout several texts of other ancient cultures indicating that the event must have been global, there are also several UFO’s mentioned and quite possibly the great flood may have been a rewritten story if the Mediterranean sea’s birth after breaking through the land bridge that held back the oceans. But here in is my problem with these events, The way they are re-portrayed makes them out to be events of god that we are not supposed to question, why? because of the true nature of the unexplained, this is part of religion, back before we had technology how else could people describe a strobe of orange light from the sky, than “fire descending from the heavens”, now this is the part where i agree with Vara on the point of the bible being altered to take something that could have been significant in another way and changing it, warping it to fit their goals. When i heard the story of the chariots of fire in religious studies class, we were told that this is a sign of the greatness of god, rubbish, was what i said (but not out loud otherwise id be in for detention), why is it that the next generation was told the exact same story as the last and no body questioned it, didn’t it seem odd to my teacher, that flaming chariots from the sky would sound like a description of an unidentified aircraft, to the best of the Hebrew times description? I just think before Christianity is to take off with me again, it really needs to rethink how it teaches us and the generations to come. The bible was a book written for the dark ages of kings and slaves still touted in the age of enlightenment and questioning.

    Sorry for the ramble but I just never have seen the point in Christianity or its sub religions (Lutheran, Catholic etc). I have and always will believe in a higher source of power, an immortal governing force in the universe, but i refuse to tie it down with a mortal name.

    Luke

    Like

    • Well said, Luke. It takes a great deal of research to fully understand and interpret the Bible for what it is…a collection of writings from various sources and different time periods, with their own interpretations. Unfortunately, most people never bother to do their own research, and follow the words of their pastor who tells them, “If it is in the Bible, then it is true.” And “the Bible is God’s word”. Then, when some people see problems or conflicts in the Bible, they chose to reject it all altogether out of ignorance.
      I am not against religion, because we all need something to believe in and some structure to live by; it is dogma that I have issues with.

      Like

  15. I hope the following link to a french website of wikipedia will end the discussion about this bad hoax:

    Like

  16. Parecen monedas de una antigua civilización…MONEDAS troqueladas por su perimetro…

    Like

  17. After all this useless arguments from ancient machines to religion, let me ask you all readers, how many of you have got mechanical clocks with you? If not, get one from where ever it is available. Sooner or later you will need one to watch the time !!!

    Like

  18. great questions, vara, only apparently you didn’t actually read my post. I specifically said the bible does NOT say that the earth is only 6000 years old. So how am i supposed to “prove” something i didn’t even postulate? And let me educate you a bit. There is no piece of ancient literature, anywhere, that has more manuscripts that allow us to trace it from it’s origins to current translation that the bible. There are tens of thousands mss, papyri, fragments, entire segments of scripture, complete books, etc. from within decades of the actual occurence of said events, that allow us to follow the trail. Just because there are different translations doesn’t mean they are inaccurate. The bible was edited? Do you mean putting together 66 books into one bible, books written by dozens of individuals, over thousands of years, yet able to maintain the key thread of thought (the redemption of man by God) throughout the entire story? Is that what you mean by editing? And what would you accept proof (remember how subjective that can be?) of Adam? A photograph? Drivers license? For that matter, how are you sure you are who you say you are? You might just be a hologram inside my hologram brain. And yes, I suspected as much. You have no examples of the historical unreliability of the bible. You merely repeated your assertion, the crossed your arms, pouted, and insisted you would “stand by it firmly, unshakably”. That is not proof. It is not even an example. So you have no examples, i assume. Then feel free to stand firmly and unshakably by a lie. You wouldn’t be the first. I was once challenged on a site to give an example of the historical and archaelogical accuracy of scripture. I gave over a hundred. And if I did that here, I bet I’d get the same response. You would ignore the evidence, resort to personal insult, and say that it doesn’t prove the bible is true. And like them, you would miss the point. You can’t prove anything is true, at least not in every individual possible multiverse. You must decide what is true for yourself and live by it. My point to you is that the bible is ACCURATE in it’s words and meanings. Interpretations may vary. I will leave the challenge open to you. Prove, give me just one instance, where the bible is inaccurate (remember, you can’t prove Adam and Eve DIDNT exist). Just one. Then you win(if you are correct). Until then i will challenge you on it. Luke, nice post. will comment on later. Appreciate your more reasoned approach. Don’t agree with all of it, but understand and appreciate it, and will kindly respond later. Have a nice day/night.

    Like

    • Ok chuck, lets shorten the posts and keep the debate simple.
      Name for me the first two humans god created on earth.
      ————————–
      Then After you have done this, Prove to me, that said two people were in Fact the two first people on earth.

      Like

      • vara,
        Did you present any proof? The challange was for you to present your argument. Yes you can argue this, to what end? “To stand firmly, unshakably”, not in an attempt to make you made, but this is a religous “Stand” to “one’s” self. Is the bible correct? I beleive so, but does human error happen? As in all things “man kind” touches…. YES.
        The bible, if you were to study it in the language it was first written, The very first Verse says in the begining God Created. In the dictated language Created is only used two times by God. Now does this spark any nterest as to why that would be of importance, or do you stand formly,unshakably… or are you willing to move when you hear some spark of truth, are you willing to persue, are you willing to have faith in something other than yourself? Ball in your court! But do you choose to be angry… or I would hope, eager to seek and find the truth.

        Not Your Average Christian

        Like

      • I presented evidence.
        There is No such thing as proof for proof is subjective.
        No one else presented any more proof to thier arguments than did I.
        I stand Unshakable still. How ever, I am open to change of opinion.
        I move when I hear truth.
        Truth to one how ever, is not always truth to another.
        Its a funny world.
        For example…
        Can you please recite to me the portions of the bible which say incest is wrong and against god? Can you also name Cain or Able’s mate for with which they continued to propagate the species? Can you please name the parents of those women Cain and Able propagated with?
        Can you Name the First woman god created?
        Can you quote to me in the new testaments, information or verse’s pertaining to Lilith?
        Can you tell me the Total number of Gospels written? How many of those are in the new testament?
        I stand firm that the bible in its current form is misleading, in many cases inaccurate, (though not all) has been repeatedly edited to suit an agenda for a given moment in history, which leads to compounded mistakes and misunderstandings, which are taken as truth and re-propagated.
        Most people believe Jesus was a White man.
        They believe that he was nailed to a cross which stands straight up and down vertically with the cross section horizontal.
        They believe that he was nailed through the palms of the hands.
        They believe a great many other things which are in historical ere, but which are taught as if they were factual and true.
        I maintain that the bible in its current form is ripe with inaccuracies and this makes it in My personal opinion,…. a Comedy of errors.
        ~ VARAKIENEN.

        PS: I will Not be commenting on this subject further should you reply. Debating the bible is a VERY explosive and touchy subject, and No proof can be offered on either side of any argument which will satisfy the opposite sides criteria for what constitutes Proof.
        Such debate may possibly be brought up on a thread which specifically pertains to biblical scripture and history as the main subject matter, but That is not This thread. It is other wise distraction and ripe for hard feelings which we have been attempting to weed out here on TbtS.
        Thank you for your Input. Be well.
        ~ VARAKIENEN.

        Like

  19. Bruce Ramsey

    It looks like they were organic. If those things ARE metalic, then we have something.

    Like

  20. Dukuh matang

    Golubev or Gobulev ?

    Like